Cornelis Hermannus Sietse Wieringa

• Greenhalgh, Trisha; Payne, Rebecca; Hemmings, Nina; Leach, Helen; Hanson, Isabel & Khan, Anwar [Vis alle 20 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2024). Training needs for staff providing remote services in general practice: a mixed-methods study. British Journal of General Practice. ISSN 0960-1643. 74(738), s. e17–e26. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0251.
• Payne, Rebecca; Clarke, Aileen; Swann, Nadia; Van Dael, Jackie; Brenman, Natassia & Rosen, Rebecca [Vis alle 22 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: Multimethod qualitative study combining Safety i and Safety II analysis. BMJ Quality and Safety. ISSN 2044-5415. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016674. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Strange, Martha Pickard; Booth, Amy; Akiki, Melissa; Wieringa, Cornelis Hermannus Sietse & Shaw, Sara E. (2023). The Role of Virtual Consulting in Developing Environmentally Sustainable Health Care: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. ISSN 1438-8871. 25. doi: 10.2196/44823.
• Greenhalgh, Trisha; Ladds, Emma; Hughes, Gemma Lucille; Moore, Lucy; Wherton, Joseph & Shaw, Sara E. [Vis alle 11 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2022). Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? qualitative study in UK general practice. British Journal of General Practice. ISSN 0960-1643. 72(718), s. E351–E360. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0658.
• Moleman, Marjolein; Macbeth, Fergus; Wieringa, Cornelis Hermannus Sietse; Forland, Frode; Shaw, Beth & Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun (2021). From “getting things right” to “getting things right now”: Developing COVID-19 guidance under time pressure and knowledge uncertainty. Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. ISSN 1356-1294. 28(1), s. 49–56. doi: 10.1111/jep.13625. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Background: At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, guidance was needed more than ever to direct frontline healthcare and national containment strategies. Rigorous guidance based on robust research was compromised by the emergence of the pandemic and the urgency of need for guidance. Rather than aiming to “get guidance right”, guidance developers needed to “get guidance right now”. Aim: To examine how guidance developers have responded to the need for credible guidance at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: An exploratory mixed-methods study was conducted among guidance developers. A web-based survey and follow-up interviews were used to examine the most pertinent challenges in developing COVID-19 guidance, strategies used to address these, and perspectives on the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on future guidance development. Results: The survey was completed by 46 guidance developers. Survey findings showed that conventional methods of guidance development were largely unsuited for COVID-19 guidance, with 80% (n = 37) of respondents resorting to other methods. From the survey and five follow-up interviews, two themes were identified to bolster the credibility of guidance in a setting of extreme uncertainty: (1) strengthening enduser involvement and (2) conjoining evidence review and recommendation formulation. 70% (n = 32) of survey respondents foresaw possible changes in future guidance production, most notably shortening development time, by reconsidering how to balance between rigour and speed for different types of questions. Conclusion: “Getting guidance right” and “getting guidance right now” are not opposites, rather uncertainties are always part of guidance development and require guidance developers to balance scientific robustness with usability, acceptability, adequacy and contingency. This crisis points to the need to acknowledge uncertainties of scientific evidence more explicitly and points to mechanisms to live with such uncertainty, thus extending guidance development methods and processes more widely.

• Wieringa, Sietse; Engebretsen, Eivind; Heggen, Kristin & Greenhalgh, Trisha (2021). Clinical guidelines and the pursuit of reducing epistemic uncertainty. An ethnographic study of guideline development panels in three countries. Social Science and Medicine. ISSN 0277-9536. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113702.
• Keijser, Wouter A.; Handgraaf, Henricus J.M.; Isfordink, Liz M.; Janmaat, Vincent T.; Vergroesen, Pieter-Paul A. & Verkade, Julia M.J.S. [Vis alle 8 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2019). Development of a national medical leadership competency framework: The Dutch approach. BMC Medical Education. ISSN 1472-6920. 19:441, s. 1–19. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1800-y.
• Sandset, Tony Joakim & Wieringa, Sietse (2019). Impure policies: controversy in HIV prevention and the making of evidence. Critical Policy Studies. ISSN 1946-0171. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2019.1661865.
• Wieringa, Sietse; Dreesens, Dunja; Forland, Frida Aune; Hulshof, Carel; Lukersmith, Sue & Macbeth, Fergus [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2018). Different knowledge, different styles of reasoning: a challenge for guideline development. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. ISSN 2515-446X. 23(3), s. 87–91. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110844. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Wieringa, Sietse; Engebretsen, Eivind; Heggen, Kristin & Greenhalgh, Trisha (2018). Rethinking Bias and Truth in Evidence-based Healthcare. Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. ISSN 1356-1294. 24(5), s. 930–938. doi: 10.1111/jep.13010. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Wieringa, Sietse; Engebretsen, Eivind; Heggen, Kristin & Greenhalgh, Trisha (2018). How knowledge is constructed and exchanged in virtual communities of physicians: Qualitative study of Mindlines Online. Journal of Medical Internet Research. ISSN 1438-8871. 20(2), s. 1–14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8325. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Wieringa, Sietse; Engebretsen, Eivind; Heggen, Kristin & Greenhalgh, Trisha (2017). Has evidence-based medicine ever been modern? A Latour-inspired understanding of a changing EBM. Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. ISSN 1356-1294. 23(5), s. 964–970. doi: 10.1111/jep.12752. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Elwyn, Glyn; Wieringa, Sietse & Greenhalgh, Trisha (2016). Clinical encounters in the post-guidelines era. The BMJ. ISSN 1756-1833. 353:i3200. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3200.
• Engebretsen, Eivind; Heggen, Kristin; Wieringa, Sietse & Greenhalgh, Trish (2016). Uncertainty and objectivity in clinical decision making: a clinical case in emergency medicine. Medicine, Health care and Philosophy. ISSN 1386-7423. 19(4), s. 595–603. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9714-5.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Wieringa, Cornelis Hermannus Sietse; McGuire, Hugh; Wang, Qi; Van Der Wees, Philip & Shaw, Beth (2023). Making sustainable healthcare decisions: Three turns towards sustainable guidelines. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. ISSN 2515-446X. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112352. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i Cristin