Liv Ariane Augestad

• Garratt, Andrew; Hansen, Tonya Moen; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand, Kim & Stavem, Knut (2021). Norwegian population norms for the EQ-5D-5L: results from a general population survey. Quality of Life Research. ISSN 0962-9343. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02938-7. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Luo, Nan; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Rand, Kim (2020). Testing the “Nonstopping” Time Trade-Off: Is It Better Than the Composite Time Trade-Off? Value in Health. ISSN 1098-3015. 23(11), s. 1489–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.006.
• Hansen, Tonya Moen; Helland, Ylva; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand, Kim; Stavem, Knut & Garratt, Andrew Malcolm (2020). Elicitation of Norwegian EQ-5D-5L values for hypothetical and experience-based health states based on the EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) protocol. BMJ Open. ISSN 2044-6055. 10(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034683.
• Labberton, Angela Susan; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Thommessen, Bente & Barra, Georg Mathias Honore (2020). The association of stroke severity with health-related quality of life in survivors of acute cerebrovascular disease and their informal caregivers during the first year post stroke: a survey study. Quality of Life Research. ISSN 0962-9343. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02516-3.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand, Kim; Luo, Nan & Barra, Mathias (2019). Using the choice sequence in time trade-off as discrete choices: do the two stories match? Value in Health. ISSN 1098-3015. s. 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.003.
• Østborg, Tilde Broch; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Barra, Mathias (2019). Bruk ordet fosterantallsreduksjon. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. ISSN 0029-2001. 139(15). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.19.0409.
• Michel, Yvonne Anne; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Barra, Mathias & Rand, Kim (2018). A Norwegian 15D value algorithm: proposing a new procedure to estimate 15D value algorithms. Quality of Life Research. ISSN 0962-9343. s. 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2043-9.
• Stavem, Knut; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø & Rand, Kim (2018). General population norms for the EQ-5D-3 L in Norway: comparison of postal and web surveys. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. ISSN 1477-7525. 16(204), s. 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1029-1. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Michel, Yvonne Anne; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Rand, Kim (2018). Comparing 15D valuation studies in Norway and Finland - Challenges when combining information from several valuation tasks. Value in Health. ISSN 1098-3015. 21(4), s. 462–470. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.018. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Rand, Kim; Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Luo, Nan (2017). Less Is More: Cross-Validation Testing of Simplified Nonlinear Regression Model Specifications for EQ-5D-5L Health State Values. Value in Health. ISSN 1098-3015. 20(7), s. 945–952. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.03.013. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Michel, Yvonne Anne; Engel, Lidia; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Whitehurst, David G T (2016). “When I saw walking I just kind of took it as wheeling”: interpretations of mobility-related items in generic, preference-based health state instruments in the context of spinal cord injury. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. ISSN 1477-7525. 164(14). doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0565-9. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Background In health economic analyses, health states are typically valued using instruments with few items per dimension. Due to the generic (and often reductionist) nature of such instruments, certain groups of respondents may experience challenges in describing their health state. This study is concerned with generic, preference-based health state instruments that provide information for decisions about the allocation of resources in health care. Unlike physical measurement instruments, preference-based health state instruments provide health state values that are dependent on how respondents interpret the items. This study investigates how individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) interpret mobility-related items contained within six preference-based health state instruments. Methods Secondary analysis of focus group transcripts originally collected in Vancouver, Canada, explored individuals’ perceptions and interpretations of mobility-related items contained within the 15D, Assessment of Quality of Life 8-dimension (AQoL-8D), EQ-5D-5L, Health Utilities Index (HUI), Quality of Well-Being Scale Self-Administered (QWB-SA), and the 36-item Short Form health survey version 2 (SF-36v2). Ritchie and Spencer’s ‘Framework Approach’ was used to perform thematic analysis that focused on participants’ comments concerning the mobility-related items only. Results Fifteen individuals participated in three focus groups (five per focus group). Four themes emerged: wording of mobility (e.g., ‘getting around’ vs ‘walking’), reference to aids and appliances, lack of suitable response options, and reframing of items (e.g., replacing ‘walking’ with ‘wheeling’). These themes reflected item features that respondents perceived as relevant in enabling them to describe their mobility, and response strategies that respondents could use when faced with inaccessible items. Conclusion Investigating perceptions to mobility-related items within the context of SCI highlights substantial variation in item interpretation across six preference-based health state instruments. Studying respondents’ interpretations of items can help to understand discrepancies in the health state descriptions and values obtained from different instruments. This line of research warrants closer attention in the health economics and quality of life literature. Keywords Preference-based health state instruments – Validity – HRQoL – Mobility – Spinal cord injury – Reframing – Item interpretation

• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Stavem, Knut; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø; Samuelsen, Carl Haakon & Rand-Hendriksen, Kim (2016). Influenced from the start: anchoring bias in time trade-off valuations. Quality of Life Research. ISSN 0962-9343. 25(9), s. 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1266-x.
• Barra, Mathias; Lindstrøm, Jonas Christoffer; Adams, Samantha Salvesen & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2015). Sesongjusterte fødselsfrekvenser er Poisson-fordelte. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. ISSN 0029-2001. 135(23/24), s. 2154–2158. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.14.1506.
• Barra, Mathias; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Whitehurst, David G T & Rand-Hendriksen, Kim (2015). Examining the relationship between health-related quality of life and increasing numbers of diagnoses. Quality of Life Research. ISSN 0962-9343. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1026-3.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Stavem, Knut & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø (2013). Time trade-off and attitudes toward euthanasia: implications of using 'death' as an anchor in health state valuation. Quality of Life Research. ISSN 0962-9343. 22(4), s. 705–714. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0192-9.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø & Stavem, Knut (2012). Impact of Transformation of Negative Values and Regression Models on Differences Between the UK and US EQ-5D Time Trade-Off Value Sets. PharmacoEconomics (Auckland). ISSN 1170-7690. 30(12), s. 1203–1214. doi: 10.2165/11595420-000000000-00000. Vis sammendrag

  Background National EQ-5D value sets are developed because preferences for health may vary in different populations. UK values are lower than US values for most of the 243 possible EQ-5D health states. Although similar protocols were used for data collection, analytic choices regarding how to model values from the collected data may also influence national value sets. Participants in the UK and US studies assessed the same subset of 42 EQ-5D health states using the time trade-off (TTO) method. However, different methods were used to transform negative values to a range bounded by 0 and −1, and values for all 243 health states were estimated using two different regression models. The transformation of negative values is inconsistent with expected utility theory, and the choice of which transformation method to use lacks a theoretical foundation. Objectives Our objectives were to assess how much of the observed difference between the UK and US EQ-5D value sets may be explained by the choice of transformation method for negative values relative to the choice of regression model and the differences between elicited TTO values in the respective national studies (datasets). Methods We applied both transformation methods and both regression models to each of the two datasets, resulting in eight comparable value sets. We arranged these value sets in pairs in which one source of difference (transformation method, regression model or dataset) was varied. For each of these paired value sets, we calculated the mean difference between the two matching values for each of the 243 health states. Finally, we calculated the mean utility gain for all possible transitions between pairs of EQ-5D health states within each value set and used the difference in transition scores as a measure of impact from changing transformation method, regression model or dataset. Results The mean absolute difference in values was 1.5 times larger when changing the transformation method than when using different datasets. The choice of transformation method had a 3.2 times larger effect on the mean health gain (transition score) than the choice of dataset. The mean health gain in the UK value set was 0.09 higher than in the US value set. Using the UK transformation method on the US dataset reduced this absolute difference to 0.02. The choice of regression model had little overall impact on the differences between the value sets. Conclusions Most of the observed differences between the UK and US value sets were caused by the use of different transformation methods for negative values, rather than differences between the two study populations as reflected in the datasets. Changing the regression model had little impact on the differences between the value sets.

• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2012). Time Trade-Off and Ranking Exercises Are Sensitive to Different Dimensions of EQ-5D Health States. Value in Health. ISSN 1098-3015. 15(5), s. 777–782. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.002.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Dahl, Fredrik Andreas; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø & Stavem, Knut (2012). A Shortcut to Mean-Based Time Tradeoff Tariffs for the EQ-5D? Medical decision making. ISSN 0272-989X. 32(4), s. 569–577. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11431607.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø & Stavem, Knut (2012). Learning Effects in Time Trade-Off Based Valuation of EQ-5D Health States. Value in Health. ISSN 1098-3015. 15(2), s. 340–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.010.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Dahl, Fredrik Andreas (2012). A critical re-evaluation of the regression model specification in the US D1 EQ-5D value function. Population Health Metrics. ISSN 1478-7954. 10. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-10-2.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø & Stavem, Knut (2011). Comparison of hypothetical and experienced EQ-5D valuations: relative weights of the five dimensions. Quality of Life Research. ISSN 0962-9343. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0016-3. Vis sammendrag

  Purpose: EQ-5D tariffs are typically based on general population valuations studies, but whether valuations of experienced health (EH) or hypothetical health (HH) are more appropriate is disputed. Previous comparisons of valuations of EH and HH have focused on absolute differences in dimension-specific regression coefficients. We examined differences in the relative importance attributed to the EQ-5D dimensions between EH and HH valuations of EQ-5D states in the US. Methods: We used the regression model from the US EQ-5D valuation study on EH ratings from the 2000-2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and on HH ratings from the US EQ-5D valuation study, conducted in 2001. We then compared patterns in the relative magnitudes of coefficients that corresponded to the five dimensions. Results: In the HH model, self care and pain/discomfort were the most important dimensions, while usual activities was the least important. In the EH model, usual activities was the most important dimension, while self-care was one of the least important. Discussion: The findings reveal considerable differences between stated preferences for HH and ratings of EH, particularly for self-care and usual activities. The findings accentuate the importance of the debate about which groups’ values should be used in medical priority setting.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Labberton, Angela Susan; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Thommessen, Bente & Barra, Mathias (2020). The impact of stroke severity on health related quality of life in patients with acute cerebrovascular disease and their informal caregivers.
• Rand, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2017). A framework for QALY-calculations with different weights for improvements and impairments of health.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Barra, Mathias (2016). Using the choice sequence in time trade-off as discrete choices - do the two stories match?
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Barra, Mathias (2016). End-aversion in time trade-off valuation?
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2016). Kvalitetsjusterte leveår (QALYs) og måling av helserelatert livskvalitet: Viktige mål med vesentlige svakheter.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2016). Kvalitetsjusterte leveår (QALYs) og måling av helserelatert livskvalitet: Viktige mål med vesentlige svakheter.
• Michel, Yvonne Anne; Engel, Lidia; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Whitehurst, David G T (2016). Interpretations of mobility-related items in generic, preference-based health state instruments in the context of spinal cord injury.
• Michel, Yvonne Anne; Engel, Lidia; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Whitehurst, David G T (2016). "When I saw walking, I just kind of took it as wheeling" Diverging interpretations of items in generic preference-based HRQoL instruments: the example of mobility and spinal cord injury.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Barra, Mathias (2016). Using the choice sequence in Time trade-off as Discrete Choices – do the two stories match?
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Barra, Mathias (2016). Nesten perfekt helse -er det virkelig så ille?
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel & Luo, Nan (2015). LESS IS MORE – EQ-5D-5L VALUE SETS BASED ON AN 8-PARAMETER NON-LINEAR MODEL PREDICTS LEFT-OUT STATES BETTER THAN A 20-PARAMETER MAIN EFFECTS MODEL.
• Luo, Nan; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2015). Testing the ‘non-stopping’ time trade-off procedure for valuation of the EQ-5D-5L health states: a study of two countries.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Luo, Nan (2015). Anchoring bias in EQ-5D valuation based on face-to-face time trade-off interviews.
• Michel, Yvonne Anne; Engel, Lidia; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Whitehurst, David G T (2015). “When I saw walking, I just kind of took it as wheeling.” A qualitative exploration of how individuals with spinal cord injury perceive mobility-related items in generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane & Rand-Hendriksen, Kim (2015). Hva skjer på y-aksen? Tilfeldige metodevalg og konsekvenser for prioriteringer i helsevesenet .
• Michel, Yvonne Anne; Engel, Lidia; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Whitehurst, David G T (2015). “When I saw walking, I just kind of took it as wheeling.” A qualitative exploration of how individuals with spinal cord injury perceive mobility-related items in generic health-related quality of life instruments.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Ramos-Goñi, Juan Manuel; Luo, Nan & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2015). Less is more: 8,9 and 11 parameter multiplicative models outperformed the 20-parameter main-effects regression model in monotonicity and ability to predict left out states.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2015). Kvalitetsjusterte leveår (QALYs) og måling av helserelatert livskvalitet - the devil is in the details.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane (2014). Prisen på et liv. [TV]. NRK.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane & Rand-Hendriksen, Kim (2014). Utfordringer ved bruk av forskjellige QALY-mål i vurdering av legemidler.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2014). A framework for differentiating between health improvements and impairments in QALY-analyses.
• Ytrehus, Kirsti; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Hagve, Tor-Arne; Kristoffersen, Espen Saxhaug; Kvernmo, Siv & Middelfart, Anna [Vis alle 8 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2014). Satsingen på medisinsk forskning kan bli svekket. Dagens medisin. ISSN 1501-4290. 19.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane & Rand-Hendriksen, Kim (2014). Helserelatert livskvalitet, QALYs og prioritering.
• Barra, Mathias; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Whitehurst, David (2014). Additional condtions add up to little HRQoL.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Luo, Nan (2014). MAT-Study: Varied starting point and iteration sizes, Non-stopping TTO.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2014). Screening and QALYs: Does knowing more make us healthier and happier?
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Luo, Nan (2014). EQVT iteration experiment #1: varied starting point and iteration step sizes.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Luo, Nan (2014). Another nail in the coffin for time trade-off for states considered worse than death. An analysis of worse than death responses from recent EQ-5D-5L valuation studies using lead-time TTO.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2013). Helserelatert livskvalitet: Hvorfor, hvordan og utfordringer.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2013). EQ-5D and subjective well-being: construct overlap and problems with regression modeling.
• Samuelsen, Carl Haakon; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Stavem, Knut; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø & Rand-Hendriksen, Kim (2013). Anchoring effects in the Lead-Time Time Trade-Off.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane & Stavem, Knut (2013). Valuation 2.0 - are we ready to web? Population representativeness in valuation and health survey settings. Vis sammendrag

  Background: In survey settings where population representativeness is central, postal surveys mailed to random recipients have been the gold standard. With rapidly increasing pervasiveness of online computers and increasing general population computer literacy, web-surveys pose an attractive alternative for several reasons: 1. a growing proportion of the population use the postal system rarely or not at all. 2. Modern web-survey technology allows more advanced surveys presented in formats that are easy for respondents to use. 3. Postal surveys are considerably more costly than similar web-surveys. All survey designs suffer from respondent self-selection: different respondent characteristics may increase or decrease willingness to participate. The objective of this study was to compare the population representativeness and EQ-5D self-reported health in a valuation study using state-of-the-art postal and web-survey formats. Methods: We developed postal and web variants of a health valuation survey with intended to maximize representativeness in the adult Norwegian population. The postal version was mailed to a random sample of 5000 persons over the age of 18 drawn from the Norwegian Population Registry. For the web-survey, we invited respondents from the market research company Synovate’s standing panel of willing survey participants. We compared the two surveys in terms of distribution of respondents’ demographic characteristics and EQ-5D self-ratings. Results Postal survey demographics: 4899 respondents received the forms, of which 1276 were returned (26%) and 1185 were completed (24.2%). Response rate increased with age, with underrepresentation below the age of 40 and overrepresentation of all groups above 40. Response rate was strongly correlated with education: 19% had 4+ years of upper tertiary education (Norway: 6.5%) and 11.6% with primary/lower secondary education (Norway: 29.8%). Web survey demographics: 1936 respondents were invited, of which 1003 (52%) completed the form. Representation was close to general population in terms of education and sex. Respondents aged 30 to 60 years were overrepresented, while respondents above 70 and below 30 were underrepresented. Final cost per analyzed respondent was NOK 306 (postal) and NOK 201 (web). EQ-5D: 50.6% (postal) and 57% (web) reported problems on at least one EQ-5D dimensions. 5% (postal and 7.6% (web) reported extreme problems on at least one dimension, more than half of which were on the pain/discomfort dimension. Distribution of problems by dimension were not significantly different. Discussion: The web-based survey outperformed the postal survey in terms of demographic representativeness, particularly for education. The web survey had low participation rates in respondents over the age of 70, possibly due to lower levels of computer literacy. There were small differences in the distribution of reported health problems between the survey modes, with more problems reported by web respondents. As education is a predictor of good health, this may be caused by better representativeness in terms of education. However, both surveys may suffer from underrepresentation of respondents with severe health problems. Web surveys may already be superior to postal surveys in terms of representativeness. However, satisficing behavior observed in both survey modes suggest that complex surveys such as health state valuation may not be recommended using either method. For surveys not dependent on complex methods , the web-based approach may be recommended for use in in countries with high pervasiveness of computers and high levels of computer literacy.

• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø & Stavem, Knut (2012). Time trade-off and attitudes toward euthanasia: implications using ‘death’ as an anchor in health state valuation.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø & Stavem, Knut (2012). Time trade-off and ranking exercises are sensitive to different dimensions of EQ-5D health states.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø & Stavem, Knut (2012). Postal or web-based? Population representativeness in health survey settings.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Stavem, Knut & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø (2012). What factors explain willingness to trade in the time trade-off exercises, and what factors are important?
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2012). EQ-5D - Dårligere enn sitt rykte?
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Stavem, Knut & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø (2011). Attitudes Towards Euthanasia Influences Values Elicited With the TTO Method.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Stavem, Knut & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø (2010). Relative Importance of EQ-5D Dimensions in Experienced and Hypothetical Health Valuations.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Stavem, Knut & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø (2010). Learning Effects in EQ-5D Time Trade-Off Valuations.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim & Augestad, Liv Ariane (2010). Testing the Accuracy of Composite Health State Utility Estimators: An Analysis of Medical Condition Pairs from the MEPS 2001 and 2003.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Stavem, Knut & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø (2010). Learning Effects in EQ-5D TTO Valuation.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø & Stavem, Knut (2010). Comparison of hypothetical and experienced EQ-5D valuation: relative weights of the 5 dimensions.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Stavem, Knut & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø (2009). Time Out for Time Trade-Off: Redundant or Invalid Measures in US, UK, and Danish EQ-5D Valuation Studies.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Stavem, Knut & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø (2009). Choice of Transformation of Negative Utilities: Impact on Final Tariffs.
• Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Augestad, Liv Ariane; Stavem, Knut & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø (2009). Time-out for Time Trade-off? Redundant or invalid measures in the US TTO-based EQ-5D tariff.
• Augestad, Liv Ariane; Rand-Hendriksen, Kim; Stavem, Knut & Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø (2009). Choice of transformation on negative utilities: Impact on the US and UK tariffs.
• Pedersen, Kine; Godager, Geir; Tyrihjell, Johannes Bjørnstad; Værnø, Susanne Gerda; Gundersen, Martine Bergh & Iversen, Tor [Vis alle 11 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). Evaluering av handlingsplan for allmennlegetjenesten 2020–2024: Evalueringsrapport II. Oslo Economics. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Pedersen, Kine; Pedersen, Kine; Godager, Geir; Rognlien, Hans David; Tyrihjell, Johannes Bjørnstad & Værnø, Susanne Gerda [Vis alle 12 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2022). Evaluering av handlingsplan for allmennlegetjenesten 2020–2024: Evalueringsrapport I. Oslo Economics. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i Cristin