Marking Criteria

This form is used as a guide for examiners for grading courses at Department of Criminology and Sociology of Law. 

Changes spring 2021 due to coronavirus

Due to the pandemic, all teaching at the Faculty of Law has been carried out online in the Spring semester 2021. Moreover, access to student reading rooms has been subject to significant restrictions. As the pandemic has made the study situation extremely demanding, grading must take this into account.

***

All criteria are to be included in the overall assessment. Each candidate is assessed individually with regards to the course's learning requirements; the active normal distribution curve is not implemented.

Marking Criteria Guide

Course information

Course code and name  KRIM4960 – Green Criminology
Syllabus/achievement requirements  Spring 2021
Formal prerequisite knowledge

Masterlevel. No obligatory prerequisites beyond the minimum requirements for entrance to higher education in Norway.

Examination Students are graded on the basis of a 4-day take-home exam (Maximum 3600 Words / 9 pages).
Last updatet  23.04.2021

Assessment criteria form

Grade   Overall guidelines for setting grades 

Førsteinntrykk, lesbarhetFørsteinntrykk, lesbarhetFørsteinntrykk, lesbarhetOverall impression and readability, knowledge and content, reflection and Independence.

Førsteinntrykk, lesbarhetFørsteinntrykk, lesbarhet

 

Formal skills ans structure

A: Excellent

 

A: An excellent performance, clearly outstanding. The candidate demonstrates excellent judgement and a high degree of independent thinking.

 

Kandidaten viser meget god vurderingsevne og selvstendighet

 

The exam answer gives clear and precise answers to the questions posed in the examination question paper(s).

An outstanding performance that shows a breadth and solidity of knowledge about the subject as well as ability for critical reflection and / or an originality of its application. The quality of discussion is carried by an analytical approach to the problem at hand. The reasoning is clear and well-argued. 

The exam answer demonstrates:

  • excellent command of central concepts, exposition skills and level of precision
  • excellent ability to dimension the answer sensibly.
     
B: Very good   B: A very good performance. The candidate demonstrates sound judgement and a very good degree of independent thinking.

The exam answer gives very good answers to the questions posed in the examination question paper(s).

The candidate shows a very good overview of the subject. Shows good understanding of and makes independent use of knowledge on the subject. The reasoning is clear and well-argued. 

 

The exam answer demonstrates:

  • very good command of central concepts, exposition skills and level of precision
  • very good ability to dimension the answer sensibly.
C: Good C: A good performance in most areas. The candidate demonstrates a reasonable degree of judgement and independent thinking in the most important areas.

Eksamensbesvarelsen gir klare og presise svar på spørsmålene som stilles i oppgaven(e).The exam answer answers the questions posed in the examination question paper(s).

Good performance that shows a good overview of the subject’s knowledge matter.

 

The exam answer demonstrates:

  • good command of central concepts, exposition skills and level of precision
  • good ability to dimension the answer sensibly.

D: Satisfactory

 

D: A satisfactory performance, but with significant shortcomings. The candidate demonstrates a limited degree of judgement and independent thinking.

 

 

The exam answer gives inadequate answers to the questions posed in the examination question paper(s).

Quite good performance that shows uneven knowledge or limited degree of independent thinking.

 

The exam answer demonstrates:

  • satisfactory command of relevant concepts, exposition skills and level of precision
  • moderate ability to dimension the answer sensibly.
E: Sufficient E: A performance that meets the minimum criteria, but no more. The candidate demonstrates a very limited degree of judgement and independent thinking.

The exam answer gives vague answers to the questions posed in the examination question paper(s).

A sufficient performance that meets no more than the minimum criteria for the course learning requirements.  

 

The exam answer demonstrates:

  • relatively poor command of central concepts, exposition skills and level of precision
  • little ability to dimension the answer sensibly.
F: Fail   F: A performance that does not meet the minimum academic criteria. The candidate demonstrates an absence of both judgement and independent thinking.

The exam answer does not answer the questions posed in the examination question paper(s).

A performance which does not meet the minimum criteria in terms of course learning requirements. 

 

The exam answer: demonstrates:

  • poor command of central concepts, exposition skills and level of precision
  • an inability to dimension the answer sensibly.

 

 

Published Mar. 3, 2019 2:09 PM - Last modified Apr. 23, 2021 6:34 PM