Pensum/læringskrav

 

Bøker

Asdal, Kristin 2011. Politikkens natur - naturens politikk. Universitetsforlaget.

Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes & Yannick Barthe 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Collins, Harry & Trevor Pinch (eds.) 1998. The Golem at Large: What You Should Know about Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fagerberg, Jan et al. (eds.) (2005): Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation, path dependency and policy: the Norwegian case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mokyr, Joel (1992): The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapt. 5 (se Fronter)

Nelson, R. & Winter, S.  1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press.  Available in full text online (se Google scholar)

Sismondo, Sergio 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Wiley-Blackwell.

Tidd & Bessant (2013) Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th Edition. (Chapters 1-2)

Turkle, Sherry 2012. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.

 

Kompendium

Akrich, Madeleine 1992. "The De-Scription of Technical Objects" i Bijker, Wiebe E. og John Law, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 205-224.

Berg, Anne-Jorunn 1999. ”A gendered socio-technical construction: the smart house” i Donald MacKenzie og Judy Wajcman: The Social Shaping of Technology, Second Edition, Buckingham: Open University Press, s. 301-313.

Foucault, Michel. 2002. "Regjering" i Forelesninger om regjering og styringskunst. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk, s. 39-71.

Hilgartner, Stephen 2000. «Staging authoritative reports» i Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford University Press, s. 42-70.

Latour, Bruno 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Engineers and Scientists through Society. “Introduction”, (s. 1-17), “Chapter 2”(s. 63-100) og “Chapter 3”, (s. 103-144).

Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar 1986 [1979]. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. “Chapter 2” (s. 43-90) og “Postscript” (s. 273-286).

Moser, Ingunn og Hilde Thygesen 2013. “Velferdsteknologi og teleomsorg: Nye idealer of former for omsorg”, i Tjora, Aksel og Line Melby (red.) Samhandling for helse. Gyldendal Akademisk, s. 144-158.

Oudshoorn, Nelly og Trevor Pinch 2003. “Introduction”, i Oudshoorn, Nelly & Trevor Pinch (red.) How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, s. 1-25.

Wyatt, Sally 2003: «Non-Users also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet”, i Oudshoorn, Nelly and Trevor Pinch, How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, s. 67-79.

 

Digital tilgang (artikler)

Abernathy, William J. and Clark, Kim B. (1985): 'Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction', Research Policy, 14,pp 3-22.

Asdal, Kristin, Brita Brenna &Ingunn Moser 2001. Teknovitenskapelige kulturer. Spartacus. [Introduksjonkapittelet ligger i Fronter]

Asdal, Kristin, Brita Brenna & Ingunn Moser 2007. “Introduction: A history of STS”, i Asdal, Brenna & Moser (red.) Technoscience. Oslo: Unipub, s. 7-53. [Fronter]

Balconi, Margherita, Brusoni, Stefano, and Orsenigo, Luigi (2010): 'In defence of the linear model: An essay', Research Policy, 39 (1),pp 1-13.

Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). «Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.

Bergek, Anna, et al. (2008): 'Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis', Research Policy, 37 (3),pp 407-29.

Bijker, W.  2010. How is technology made? That is the question. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2010, 34, 63–76 (se WOS)

Boekholt, Patries (2010): "The Evolution of Innovation Paradigms and their Influence on research, Technological Development and Innovation Policy Instruments", chap: 14 in Smits, Kuhlman, Shapira (eds.) 2010, The Theory and practice of Innvoation Policy. Edward Elgar, UK.

Callon, Michel 1986. "Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay", i Asdal, Brenna & Moser (red.) Technoscience. Oslo: Unipub, s. 57-78. [Engelsk og norsk versjon ligger i Fronter]

Castellacci, F. and Archibugi, D. (2008): “The technology-clubs: The Distribution of Knowledge Across Nations”, Research Policy, 37, 1659-1673. [Link]

Castellacci, F. (2008): “Technology clubs, technology gaps and growth trajectories”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19 (4): 301-314. [Link]

Castellacci, F., M. Gulbrandsen, J. Hildrum, I. Martinkenaite, E. Simensen & V. Tveito (2016). "How Does Innovation Differ across Business Functions? Employee-level Analysis of a Multinational Company," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20160321, TIK Centre, University of Oslo. https://ideas.repec.org/p/tik/inowpp/20160321.html

Coenen, L., & López, F. J. D. (2010). Comparing systems approaches to innovation and technological change for sustainable and competitive economies: an explorative study into conceptual commonalities, differences and complementarities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1149-1160.

Druglitrø, Tone 2012. Å skape en standard for velferd: Forsøksdyr i norsk biovitenskap, 1953-1986. «Introduksjon» (s.11-22) og «Kap. 6: Kyndig stell» (s. 141-167). PhD-avhandling, TIK Senter for Teknologi, Innovasjon og Kultur, Universitetet i Oslo. [Fronter]

Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007): Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side, Research Policy, 36(7),pp 949-963.

Eisenhardt (1999): “Building Theories from Case Study Research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Oct., 1989), pp. 532-550.

Fagerberg, Jan (2003): 'Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature', Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13 (2),pp 125-59. Link

Fagerberg, Jan, Mowery, David, and Verspagen, Bart (2009): 'The evolution of Norway's national innovation system', Science and Public Policy, 36 (6),pp 431-44.

Felt, Ulrike og Maximilian Fochler  2013. “What science stories do: Rethinking the multiple consequences of intensified science communication” i Baranger, Patrick & Bernard Schiele (red) Science Communication Today. International perspectives, Issues and Strategies. Paris: CNRS Editions, s. 75-90. Link

Freeman, Christopher (1995): 'The 'National System of Innovation' in historical perspective', Camb. J. Econ., 19 (1),pp 5-24. Link

Freeman, C., & Perez, C. (1988). Structural Crisis of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour. In G. Dosi (Ed.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 38-66. London: Pinter.

Hermansen, Erlend A. T. 2015. "I Will Write a Letter and Change the World: The Knowledge Base Kick-Starting Norway’s Rainforest Initiative", i Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 3 (2): 34-46.

Hughes T., (1987), "The Evolution of Technological Systems", in Bijker et al. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, pp. 51 – 82.

Jensen, Casper Bruun 2005: “Citizen projects and consensus building at the Danish Board of Technology: on experiments in democracy”, i Acta Sociologica 48, s. 221-235. Link

Jensen, Morten Berg, et al. (2007), 'Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation', Research Policy, 36 (5),pp 680-93.

Kannan-Narasimhan, R. (2014). “Organizational Ingenuity in Nascent Innovations: Gaining Resources and Legitimacy through Unconventional Actions”. Organization Studies, 35(4), 483-509.

Kline, Stephen J. and Rosenberg, Nathan (1986): 'An Overview of Innovation', in Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg (eds.), The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth (Washington, DC: National Academy Press),pp 275-305.

Kuhn, T.S. (1977) “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery”, pp. 165-177, in Kuhn, T.S. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Link

de Laet, Marianne & Annemarie Mol 2000. "The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology", i Asdal, Brenna & Moser (red.) Technoscience. Oslo: Unipub, s. 179-220. [Fronter]

Law, John 2008. “Culling, Catastrophe and Collectivity”, i Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 9(1): 61-76. Link

Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967.

Merton, R. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science. Science. New Series, Vol. 159, No. 3810 (Jan. 5, 1968), pp. 56-63 (se JSTOR)

Morlacchi, Piera and Nelson, Richard R. (2011): 'How medical practice evolves: Learning to treat failing hearts with an implantable device', Research Policy, 40 (4),pp 511-25.

Moser, Ingunn og Thygesen, Hilde 2014. “Prosjekteriets dilemma: Mellom avgrenset prosjekt og muligheter for læring i teleomsorg og velferdsinnovasjon”, i Tidsskrift for forskning i sygdom og samfund, 21, s. 57-75. Link

OECD 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition.

Pinch, Trevor and Wiebe E. Bijker 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other”, i Social Studies of Science 14 (3), s. 399-441. Link

Pols, Jeanette 2010. “The heart of the matter. About good nursing and telecare”, i Health Care Analysis18 (4): 374-388. Link

Rader, Karen 2004. “Why Mice?” i Making Mice:Standardizing animals for American Biomedical reearch, 1900-1955. Princeton University Press, s. 1-24. Link

Ruppert, Evelyn, 2013. “Not Just Another Database: The Transactions that Enact Young Offenders”. Computational Culture, pp. 1-13. http://research.gold.ac.uk/9630/

Singleton, Vicky 2012. “When Contexts Meet: Feminism and Accountability in UK Cattle Farming”, i Science, Technology, & Human Values 37(4): 404-433. Link

Soneryd, Linda 2007. "Deliberations on the Unknown, the Unsensed, and the Unsayable? Public Protests and the Development of Third-Generation Mobile Phones in Sweden", i Science, Technology, & Human Values 32 (3): 287-314. Link

Teece. D.J. (2007), “Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 28:1319-1350.

Teece, D.J. (1986). “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy,” Research Policy 15(6):285–305.

Van de Ven & Poole (1990): “Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program”, Organization Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 313-335.

Winner, Langdon 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109 (1) s. 121-136. Link

Wyatt, S. (2008): "Technological determinism is dead. Long live technological determinism", i The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3. utgave. MIT press, s. 165-180. Link

Wynne, Brian 1992. "Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science", i Public Understanding of Science 1(3), s. 281-304. Link

Wynne, Brian 2010. “Strange Weather, Again. Climate Science as Political Art”, i Theory, Culture & Society 27 (no. 2-3): 289-305. Link

 

Anbefalt tilleggslitteratur

Edwards, Paul 2010. A Vast Machine. Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. MIT Press. “Introduction”( s. xi-xxvii, link) og “Chapter 1: Thinking Globally” (s. 1-25, link).

Haraway, Donna 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. Routledge. “Chapter 1. Introduction: The persistence of vision”. Link

Jasanoff, Sheila 2004. “The idiom of co-production”, in Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.) States of Knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. Routledge. Link

Skjølsvold, Tomas Moe 2015. Vitenskap, teknologi og samfunn. En introduksjon til STS. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Publisert 8. aug. 2016 08:44 - Sist endret 9. aug. 2016 10:42