MARKET-ORIENTED MODES OF GOVERNANCE
@Brenner, N., Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (2010) “Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways”. Global Networks vol. 10: 182-222. 41 pages.
@Pinson, G. and Journel, C.M. (2016) “The Neoliberal City – Theory, Evidence, Debates”. Territory, Politics, Governance vol. 4: 137-153. 17 pages.
@Storper, M. (2014) “Governing the Large Metropolis”. Territory, Politics, Governance vol. 2: 115-134. 20 pages.
@Storper, M. (2016) “The Neo-liberal City as Idea and Reality”. Territory, Politics, Governance vol. 4: 241-263. 23 pages.
@Gomez, M. V. (1998) "Reflective Images: The Case of Urban Regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao." International Journal of Urban and regional Research vol. 22: 106-121. 15 pages.
@Gomez, M. V. and Gonzalez, S. (2001) "A Reply to Beatriz Plaza’s ”The Guggenheim-Bilbao Museum Effect." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research vol. 25: 898-900. 3 pages.
@Plaza, B. (1999) "The Guggenheim-Bilbao Museum Effect: A Reply to Maria V. Gomez’ "Reflective Images: The Case of Urban Regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao". International Journal of Urban and Regional Research vol. 23: 589-592. 4 pages.
@Plaza, B. (2008) “On Some Challenges and Conditions for the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao to be an Effectice Economic Re-activator”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research vol. 32: 506-516. 11 pages
@Turok, I. (2009) "The Distinctive City. Pitfalls in the Pursuit of Differential Advantage". Environment and Planning A,41: 13-30. 18 pages. Tilgjengelig online
134 pages
URBAN PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE
@Faulconbridge, J. R. (2009) “The regulation of design in global architecture firms: embedding and emplacing buildings”. Urban Studies vol. 46: 2537-2554. 18 pages
@Grubbauer, M. (2014) “Architecture, economic imaginaries and urban politics: the office tower as socially classifying device”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38: 336–359. 24 pages.
@Talen, E. (1999) "Sense of community and neighbourhood form: an assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism". Urban Studies vol. 36: 1361-1379. 19 pages.
@Lees, L. (2001) "Towards a critical geography of architecture: the case of an ersatz Colosseum". Ecumene, vol. 8: 51-86. 36 pages.
@Jones, P. (2009) “Putting architecture in its social place: A cultural political economy of architecture”. Urban Studies vol. 46: 2519-2536. 18 pages.
115 pages
PLANNING AND POLICIES FOR SUBURBAN SPACES
*Chaves, E., Knox, P. and Bieri, D. (2011) “The restless landscape of metroburbia” i N. A. Phelps and F. Wu (ed.) International perspectives on suburbanization. A post-suburban world? Palgrave, London, pp. 35-53. 19 pages.
*Keil, R. 2018. Suburban Planet. Chapter 2: Suburbanization Explained. Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 23-40. 18 pages.
@Lupi, T. and Musterd, S. (2006) ”The suburban ‘community question’”. Urban Studies vol. 43: 801-817. 17 pages.
@Nüssli, R. and Schmid, C. (2016) “Beyond the Urban–Suburban Divide: Urbanization and the Production of the Urban in Zurich North”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40: 679–701. 22 pages.
@Phelps, N. A. and Wood, A. M. (2011) “The new post-suburban politics?” Urban Studies vol. 48 12: 2591-2610. 20 pages.
96 pages
HOUSING POLICY AND HOUSING REGIMES
@Bengtsson, B. and Ruonavaara, H. (2010) “Introduction to the Special Issue: Path Dependence in Housing”. Housing, Theory and Society 27: 193-203. 11 pages.
@Dewilde, C. (2017) “Do housing regimes matter? Assessing the concept of housing regimes through configurations of housing outcomes”. International Journal of Social Welfare 26: 384-404. 21 pages.
@Kemeny, J. (2006) “Corporatism and housing regimes”. Housing, Theory and Society 23: 1-18. 18 pages.
@Stephens, M. and van Steen, G. (2011) “Housing Poverty and Income Poverty in England and the Netherlands”. Housing Studies 26: 1035-1057. 23 pages
@Stamsø, M. (2009) “Housing and the welfare state in Norway”. Scandinavian Political Studies 32: 195-220. 26 pages.
@Tranøy, B.S. (2008) “Bubble, bust and more boom: the political economy of housing in Norway”.Comparative European Politics 6: 323-345. 23 pages.
112 pages
AREA-BASED POLICIES
@Andersen, H. S. (2002) "Can Deprived Housing Areas Be Revitalised? Efforts against Segregation and Neighbourhood Decay in Denmark and Europe". Urban Studies, vol. 39: 767-790. 24 pages.
@Andersson, R. and Musterd, S. (2005) "Area-based policies: a critical appraisal". Tijdsschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96: 377-389. 13 pages.
@Andersson, R., Bråmå, Å., and Holmqvist, E., (2010) “Counteracting segregation: Swedish policies and experiences”. Housing Studies vol. 25: 237-256. 20 pages.
*Galster, G. (2013) “Neighborhood Social Mix: Theory, Evidence, and Implications for Policy and Planning”. In Carmon, N. and Fainstein, S.S. (ed.) Policy, Planning and People: Promoting Justice in Urban Development. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 307-336. 31 pages.
@Lawless, P. (2006) “Area-based Urban Interventions: Rationale and Outcomes: The New Deal for Communities Programme in England”. Urban Studies vol. 43: 1991-2011. 21 pages.
@Lees, L. (2008) “Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards and Inclusive Urban Renaissance”? Urban Studies vol. 45: 2449-2470. 22 pages.
131 pages
Urban policies and urban transitions in Central and Eastern Europe
@Sjöberg, Örjan. 2014. “Cases on to Themselves? Theory and Research on Ex-socialist Urban Environments”. Geografie 119: 299-319. 21 pages.
@Gentile, Michael and Örjan Sjöberg. 2013. “Housing Allocation under Socialism: the Soviet Case Revisited”. Post-Soviet Affairs 29: 173-195. 23 pages.
@Sýkora, Luděk and Stefan Bouzarovski. 2012. “Multiple Transformations: Conceptualizing the Post-communist Urban Transition.” Urban Studies 49: 43-60. 18 pages.
@Kuzio, Taras. 2001. ““Transition in Post-communist States:Triple or Quadruple?” Politics 21: 168-177. 10 pages.
72 pages.
NEW MODES OF PLANNING
@Allmendinger, P. and Haughton, G. (2010) “Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces?” Environment and Planning C vol. 28: 803-818. 16 pages.
*Amin, A. and Thrift, N. Cities (2002) Cities. Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity Press, chapter 6. 26 pages.
@Desfor, G. and Jørgensen, J. (2004) "Flexible urban governance. The case of Copenhagen’s recent waterfront development". European Planning Studies vol. 12: 479-496. 18 pages.
@Fainstein, S. (2000) "New directions in planning theory". Urban Affairs Review vol. 35: 451-478. 28 pages.
@Healey, P. (2002) "On creating the ‘City’ as a collective resource". Urban Studies vol. 39: 1777-1792. 16 pages.
@Hudson, B. M. (1979) "Comparison of current planning theories: counterparts and contradictions”. Journal of the American Planning Association. October 1979: 387-398. 12 pages.
@McGuirk, P. M. and MacLaran, A. (2001) "Changing approaches to urban planning in the "entrepreneurial city": The case of Dublin". European Planning Studies vol. 9: 437-457. 21 pages.
@Metzger, J. (2011) “Neither revolution, nor resignation: (re)democratizing contemporary planning praxis: a commentary on Allmendinger and Haughton's “Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces''. Environment and Planning C vol. 29: 191-196. 6 pages.
145 pages.
805 pages (previously 783 pages)