Fakultetsnytt uke 47

• Lars Arnesen & Andrea Vige Grønningsæter (2026). Et tilbakeblikk på 10 år med juridisk kjønn i norsk rett – og et blikk på hva som fortsatt mangler. Lov og Rett. ISSN 0024-6980. 65(8), s. 535–535. doi: 10.18261/lor.65.8.4. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lars Arnesen (2026). Is European Anti-Discrimination Law Fit for Automated Decision-Making? Law: Cause or Effect. III, s. 470–493. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Jan Ole Hesselberg, Pål Ulleberg, Øystein Sørensen, Knut Inge Fostervold, Sigrid Hegna Ingvaldsen & Ida Svege (2026). Why do reviewers disagree? Evidence from four funders and 134,000 reviews. PLOS ONE. 21(9), s. 1–21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356108. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Anders Parmann (2026). Eierskap til dyr. I Endre Stavang, Ole Kristian Fauchald, Katrine Broch Hauge & Geir Stenseth (Red.), Naturressursrett - en antologi. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. ISSN 9788202874513. s. 411–436. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Kapitlet undersøker hvordan eiendomsrett til dyr oppstår, og hvordan man kan miste eiendomsretten til dyr. Spesielt drøfter kapitlet kontrollaspektet, både med tanke på å få eierskap til ville dyr gjennom fangst og jakt og på å miste det samme eierskapet.

• Marius M. Kjølstad (2026). I juristenes selskap? Foreningsvedtektenes normative og teoretiske karakter ca. 1780–1850. I Ruth Hemstad & Dag Michalsen (Red.), Foreningsvedtekter og sivilsamfunn etter 1800: Historiske og rettslige perspektiver. Pax Forlag. ISSN 9788253044903. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Catherine Banet (2026). The Cybersecurity Dimension of Wind Power Technologies: Applicability of EU Cybersecurity Regulation to Offshore Wind Projects. I Arnault Barichella & Jurei Yada (Red.), The Palgrave Handbook of Cybersecurity, Technologies and Energy Transitions. Springer Nature. ISSN 9783031041969. s. 1–16. doi: https:/link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-031-04196-9_18-1. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Offshore wind farms (OWFs) are increasingly exposed to cyberattacks in Europe, reflecting the intersection of two major trends: the expansion of renewable energy sources and the digitalization of the energy system. Because OWFs contribute significantly to Europe’s energy independence, they attract attention from geopolitical and commercial adversaries. Their vulnerability is heightened by their remote offshore locations, which necessitate extensive use of networked devices and digital connections to shore. These installations often lack robust cyber protection, and their complex supply chains—with many vendors, suppliers, and interdependencies—create numerous potential entry points for attackers. Cyberattacks on OWFs can have cross-border impacts, especially for “hybrid” projects that link multiple national electricity systems. This increases the need for regional coordination on the physical and cyber protection of critical offshore energy infrastructure among operators and project developers. The chapter explores whether OWFs, given their operational characteristics, remoteness, and sometimes cross-jurisdictional nature, need a specific cybersecurity regulatory framework or whether existing onshore rules are sufficient. The chapter examines how EU cybersecurity regulation applies at sea in European waters and neighboring countries, before reviewing and commenting on the main EU legal requirements relevant to the cybersecurity of offshore energy infrastructure. Key instruments include the Critical Entities Resilience Directive, the NIS2 Directive, the Cyber Resilience Act, the Cybersecurity Act, the network code on cybersecurity for electricity, and associated standards.

• Anna Margrete Aarhus Hudson & Benjamin de Carvalho (2026). Beyond Paxocracy? Women and authority in African peace mediation. International Feminist Journal of Politics. ISSN 1461-6742. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). International Constitutionalism: The Impact of International Law on Constitutional Reasoning in the Norwegian Supreme Court. I Katalin Kelemen (Red.), Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts. Hart Publishing Ltd. ISSN 9781509991549. s. 125–150. doi: 10.5040/9781509991518.ch-006. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  This book explores the argumentative style of the supreme courts in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden). Its findings are based on empirical research involving 280 leading constitutional cases which demonstrate that the impact of a constitutional ruling often extends far beyond the cases actually adjudicated by the courts and that it is crucial to understand how judges justify their decisions in constitutional cases. In the cases researched, the authors identify and explain the common features of the Nordic constitutional reasoning, situating the Nordic experience within a broader comparative framework. The book compares these practices with those of non-Nordic jurisdictions, analysing whether and how the approaches of Nordic supreme courts align with each other and with global trends. This is made possible through the use of a well-established conceptual and methodological framework, adapted to the Nordic context. Key aspects of judicial reasoning are examined, including the emphasis placed on specific constitutional concepts, the use of non-legal arguments, the reliance on precedents, and the types of sources typically referenced – such as preparatory works, foreign legal materials, and academic writings. The book is aimed at anyone interested in the constitutional culture of the Nordic countries and informs normative debates on constitutional law, both in scientific and political discourse. It contributes to the global academic discourse on constitutional reasoning with a unique perspective from the Nordic countries, which have often been overlooked in comparative research.

• Katalin Kelemen, Maija Dahlberg, Åsa Elmerot, Mikael Kenno Fogde, Haukur Logi Karlsson & Helle Krunke [Vis alle 8 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2026). Exploring Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts Empirically: An Introduction. I Katalin Kelemen (Red.), Constitutional Reasoning in the Nordic Supreme Courts. Hart Publishing Ltd. ISSN 9781509991549. s. 1–22. doi: 10.5040/9781509991518.ch-001. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  This book explores the argumentative style of the supreme courts in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden). Its findings are based on empirical research involving 280 leading constitutional cases which demonstrate that the impact of a constitutional ruling often extends far beyond the cases actually adjudicated by the courts and that it is crucial to understand how judges justify their decisions in constitutional cases. In the cases researched, the authors identify and explain the common features of the Nordic constitutional reasoning, situating the Nordic experience within a broader comparative framework. The book compares these practices with those of non-Nordic jurisdictions, analysing whether and how the approaches of Nordic supreme courts align with each other and with global trends. This is made possible through the use of a well-established conceptual and methodological framework, adapted to the Nordic context. Key aspects of judicial reasoning are examined, including the emphasis placed on specific constitutional concepts, the use of non-legal arguments, the reliance on precedents, and the types of sources typically referenced – such as preparatory works, foreign legal materials, and academic writings. The book is aimed at anyone interested in the constitutional culture of the Nordic countries and informs normative debates on constitutional law, both in scientific and political discourse. It contributes to the global academic discourse on constitutional reasoning with a unique perspective from the Nordic countries, which have often been overlooked in comparative research.

• Katalin Kelemen, Maija Dahlberg, Åsa Elmerot, Mikael Kenno Fogde, Haukur Logi Karlsson & Helle Krunke [Vis alle 8 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2026). Constitutional reasoning in the Nordic supreme courts: A comparative empirical analysis. International Journal of Constitutional Law. ISSN 1474-2640. 24(2), s. 580–625. doi: 10.1093/icon/moag060. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Abstract This article presents the first comparative empirical study of constitutional rea­soning in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). Drawing on forty leading constitutional cases from each of the seven examined courts, the authors apply the CONREASON method to map how arguments and key constitutional concepts are used in judicial decision-making. The study situates Nordic courts within a global comparative framework, highlighting both shared regional features and notable divergences. It shows that, despite differences in constitutional texts and institutional arrangements, the Nordic courts exhibit a distinctive combination of deference to parliamentary intent and cautious judicial review. Preparatory works occupy an unusually prominent role in constitutional interpretation, particularly in Finland and Sweden, whereas Norway and Iceland rely more heavily on precedents. At the same time, all Nordic courts display high levels of engagement with international human rights law—especially the European Convention on Human Rights—while showing limited openness to foreign influence and intra-Nordic dialogue in this field. The article also examines the use of core constitutional concepts such as the rule of law and separation of powers, revealing how their application reflects deeper legal-cultural mentalities and historical contexts. By combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, the study provides new insights into the evolving Nordic constitutional culture and its position on the global spectrum of constitutional reasoning. It concludes by discussing the potential future challenges posed by Europeanization, internationalization, and political change for the traditionally restrained role of Nordic courts.

• Gentian Zyberi & Nadia Rusi (2026). Transforming the Convergence between International Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law into Effective Protection for Persons with Disabilities in Armed Conflict Situations. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development. ISSN 2313-058X. 13(2), s. 295–311. doi: 10.56345/ijrdv13n224. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  This article examines how the convergence between international human rights law and international humanitarian law can be translated into more effective protection for persons with disabilities in armed conflict situations. It starts from the premise that armed conflict affects persons with disabilities in specific and disproportionate ways, including through abandonment, violence, inaccessible evacuation procedures, and barriers to basic services. Drawing on the conceptual framework developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), the article understands disability as the interaction between impairments, activity limitations, participation restrictions, and environmental or attitudinal barriers. The analysis addresses three questions: first, the legal basis for the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities in situations of armed conflict; second, the legal obligations for States, international organizations, humanitarian agencies, and non-State armed groups, including under the evolving doctrine of the responsibility to protect; and third, the extent to which existing legal and operational frameworks adequately respond to the specific needs of persons with disabilities, and what normative and policy developments are required to strengthen their protection in such contexts. The analysis uses relevant international and regional treaties, especially the main international human rights and humanitarian law treaties, relevant jurisprudence from UN human rights mechanisms and regional human rights systems, and studies and other materials prepared by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the United Nations Office of Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA), and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• Kjersti Lohne, Randi Solhjell & Katrine Antonsen (2027). Extraterritorial crime control: governing, positioning, resisting. Routledge. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  The edited volume develops the concept of extraterritorial crime control to make sense of the nexus between criminal justice, foreign affairs and international relations. By extraterritorial crime control, we mean the ways in which states and international organisations project and deploy criminal justice tools, institutions and norms beyond their territorial borders in order to govern, discipline or strategically shape other sovereign spaces. The extraterritorial lens enables us to see the strategic and often asymmetric ways in which criminal justice is mobilised and exported. As such, the book is aimed at understanding how extraterritorial criminal justice can function both as governance at a distance and as a form of state positioning in international relations.

• Morten Nadim (2026). Ankeutvalget - rettsutviklingens portvoktere. Universitetsforlaget. ISBN 9788215043586. 195 s. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Endre Stavang, Ole Kristian Fauchald, Katrine Broch Hauge & Geir Stenseth (2026). Naturressursrett - en antologi. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. ISBN 9788202874513. 496 s. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Naturressursretten er et fagfelt som spenner over flere juridiske disipliner, især tingsrett, miljørett og energirett. Daglig renner nyhetene nærmest over av aktuelle rettsspørsmål med slik tematikk i et naturressursbasert rettssystem som vårt eget. Formålet med boken er å synliggjøre noen utvalgte, aktuelle emner i naturressursretten. Samlet viser bokens 14 bidrag hvordan fagfeltet samtidig er både praktisk og prinsipielt viktig, mens innledningene gir en introduksjon til rettsområdet og bokens innhold.

• Anne Kjersti Befring (2026). Pasient- og brukerrettighetsloven. Lovkommentar, 1. utgave, Juridika/Aschehoug, 2026, Juridika/Aschehoug. ISBN 9788215077390. 288 s. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Boken tar for seg sentrale temaer knyttet til rettigheter for pasienter og brukere, og samtlige lovbestemmelser med kommentarer.

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• Thomas Ugelvik & Kristian Mjåland (2026). Hva kan litteraturen lære oss om fengsel? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  an romaner gi oss en annen forståelse av livet bak murene? Og hva kan litteraturen fortelle oss om straff, soning og muligheten til å begynne på nytt? I dag møtes Thomas Ugelvik og Kristian Mjåland til en samtale om fengsel, rehabilitering og menneskene bak kriminalstatistikken, med utgangspunkt i fire norske romaner: 📖 Den onde hyrde – Jens Bjørneboe
📖 Korrektur av et sorgens kapittel – Eivind Riise Hauge
📖 Ny mann – Per Marius Weidner-Olsen
📖 Tredve dager i Sandefjord – Vigdis Hjorth Fire forskjellige fortellinger som på ulike måter utforsker fengselslivet, menneskene og samfunnet rundt. 📍 Kraftverk, Kristiansand (Skippergata 24B)
🕕 I DAG, torsdag 15. oktober kl. 18.00-19.00
🎟️ GRATIS INNGANG!

• Morten Nadim (2026). Constitutional reasoning in the Norwegian Supreme Court. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). NORDIC CONREASON: Nordiske høyesteretter som konstitusjonsdomstoler - en empirisk og komparativ studie av nordiske høyesteretters grunnlovsbruk. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Ankeutvalget - rettsutviklingens portvoktere. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Kjennetegn som kan forutsi om Høyesteretts ankeutvalg vil henvise en sak til behandling - Rett24. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Det er 93 prosent sjanse for at ankeutvalget vil fremme klimakvotesaken til behandling i Høyesterett, ifølge artikkelforfatterens statistiske analyse.

• Morten Nadim (2026). Donsskriving siden 1970. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Prinsipiell eller ikke prinsipiell? Det er spørsmålet - Ankesiling i Høyesterett. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Hvordan representere en part? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Prinsipiell eller ikke prinsipiell? Det er spørsmålet - Ankesiling i Høyesterett. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Prinsipiell eller ikke prinsipiell? Det er spørsmålet - Ankesiling i Høyesterett. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Prinsipiell eller ikke prinsipiell? Det er spørsmålet - Ankesiling i Høyesterett. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Prinsipiell eller ikke prinsipiell? Det er spørsmålet - Ankesiling i Høyesterett. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Ankesiling i sivile saker - Hva kjennetegner dommene Høyesterett fremmer til behandling i avdeling. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Har jeg råd til å få rett - Rettsikkerhetsutfordringer ved kostnadsutviklingen i domstolene. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Fra tekst til tall - Metoder for statistiske analyser av rettspraksis. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Ankeutvalget - rettsutviklingens portvoktere. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Ankeutvalget - rettsutviklingens portvoktere. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Ankeutvalget - rettsutviklingens portvoktere. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Domsskriving siden 1970. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Domsskriving siden 1970. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Domsskriving siden 1970. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Morten Nadim (2026). Hvordan representere en part? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Randi Solhjell (2026). Blue Crimes and International Criminal Law. Law, Culture and the Humanities. ISSN 1743-8721. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Stefano Mazzilli Daechsel & Mareile Kaufmann (2026). Spectral Figures: Polygenic Risk Scores and Criminology. doi: https:/www.4sonline.org/final_program_toronto.php. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Heather Dewey-Hagborg & Mareile Kaufmann (2026). Making Humans: Predicting behavior from DNA, a hands-on experience. doi: https:/www.4sonline.org/final_program_toronto.php. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Mareile Kaufmann (2026). Coding the Antisocial. doi: https:/www.4sonline.org/meeting.php. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Erik Røsæg (2026). Readiness of maritime legal infrastructure. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Laura Létourneau-Tremblay, Gunnar Eskeland, Rudiger Philipp Helmuth Tscherning & Torhild Nordtveit (2026). Investments in the Hydrogen Market. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Norway and Canada's intensifying economic cooperation as critical supplier countries: what can we learn from ten years of economic and policy incentives to establish a transatlantic hydrogen economy? Our webinar - as part of the HyValue Research Project series - will feature Norwegian and Canadian experts on clean energy economics, law and trade, with a special focus on the hydrogen economy. The presentations will be followed by a moderated Q&A Discussion with audience participation

• Per Jørgen Ystehede & Thomas Ugelvik (2026). Kan fengsler fremme god helse? Forskere vil flytte blikket fra skade til håp - Institutt for kriminologi og rettssosiologi (IKRS). [Internet]. uio.no. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Rose Elisabeth Lunde, Pernille Nyvoll & Thomas Ugelvik (2026). Kan fengsler være helsefremmende? Oppspill og intro av dagens tema med utgangspunkt i boken «Helsefremmende fengsler?». Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Catherine Banet (2026). Energy Independence through Electrification: Time to Deliver. doi: https:/cerre.eu/news/energy-independence-through-electrification-time-to-deliver/. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Europe does not know where its energy dependencies lie. Traditionally, energy dependency has been understood as a country’s reliance on imported fuels such as oil, natural gas, coal, and uranium. But today, dependency can also arise through supply chains for energy technologies, foreign ownership of strategic assets, and foreign investment in critical infrastructure. Existing European indicators do not fully capture this range of risks. This means developers and policymakers cannot fully identify vulnerabilities and design effective responses.

• Vebjørn Wold (2026). Problematisk BankID-dom: HR-2026-1359-A Entercard. Nytt i privatretten : nyhetsbrev for informasjon på det privatret. ISSN 1501-9594. 2026(13). Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Ole Kristian Fauchald (2026). Naturressursrett og bokens kapitler. I Endre Stavang, Ole Kristian Fauchald, Katrine Broch Hauge & Geir Stenseth (Red.), Naturressursrett - en antologi. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. ISSN 9788202874513. s. 22–34. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Naturressursretten er et fagfelt som spenner over flere juridiske disipliner, især tingsrett, miljørett og energirett. Daglig renner nyhetene nærmest over av aktuelle rettsspørsmål med slik tematikk i et naturressursbasert rettssystem som vårt eget. Formålet med boken er å synliggjøre noen utvalgte, aktuelle emner i naturressursretten. Samlet viser bokens 14 bidrag hvordan fagfeltet samtidig er både praktisk og prinsipielt viktig, mens innledningene gir en introduksjon til rettsområdet og bokens innhold.

• Tarjei Ellingsen Røsvoll (2026). Organizing Public Power: Institutional acts and institutional capacity. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Innlegg på Potentia and Public Law

• Christoffer Conrad Eriksen (2026). EØS i sentrum: Er norske bankers renteendringer ulovlige? - Universitetet i Oslo. doi: https:/www.uio.no/forskning/scene-domus-bibliotheca/arrangementer/2026/eos-i-sentrum-renteendringer. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i NVA